Dorper Sheep
![]() |
![]() |
| Dorper ewe,
shorn |
Dorper ram,
unshorn, natural summer shed |
The sheep are usually polled, but can have prominant
horn
bases or even small horns (scurrs). The rams have a wrinkled 'roman'
muzzle, are solid and have a large gut. Ewes have small heads and
slightly lighter forequarters. The most outstanding feature is
that in summer the animals are covered in short hair on the head, neck,
belly, and legs. There is a longer wool and hair coat of greater or
lesser extent on the back, flank, and upper hind quarters. The
wool/hair coat is more extensive in winter, but is never long. Some
animals have a greater preponderance and length of hair (vs. wool) in
their coat, which makes them look 'hairier' when shorn. Shedding
starts again in late spring/early summer.
The dorper has a significantly shorter but possibly
denser
winter fleece than wiltshires. Wiltshire fleece, while longer, is
lighter.
The dorper has a reputation as an easy lambing sheep
with
ample milk production: but so does wiltshire. But where wiltshires are
seasonal breeders (breeding in autumn), ovulation in dorpers is not
linked to diminishing daylight - they can breed any time of year. The
dorper lamb is small, meaning easy birth, whereas the wiltshire lambs
have somewhat triangular narrow heads and are also easy birth. The
dorper lambs grow very quickly indeed, in contrast to wiltshire lambs,
which are slower to mature.
The dorper is a solid animal - as is the wiltshire -
but
has
the advantage of shorter legs than the wiltshire. This difference may
not last, as there is a trend to select for larger dorpers.
Dorpers have been bred in relatively arid dry
conditions, and
as a result their hooves are worn down constantly. In New Zealand
conditions the hooves grow quickly relative to many other breeds, and
so dorpers are subject to foot rot, although this is rapidly being
selected against at the moment.
There are claims that dorpers are more resistant to
internal
parasites, but the sample sizes within the few breeds compared with
were too small to draw any universal conclusions. Within breed
variation would have to be assessed, and more importantly, the
particular parasite resiliance of the subset of individuals imported
into New Zealand.