|
|
Exponentiation and Logarithms with the L scale
- prerequisites:
- learn how to multiply and divide
- learn how to find base 10 logarithms, and non-integer powers of 10
These earlier tutorials show how to find any log base 10, and any power of 10, using the L scale in combination with C or CI. Once we know how to do these tasks, and we can multiply and divide, we can find any power to any base, and any log to any base, using the L and C scales along with the identities:


In the first case, notice that raising any base to a power is the same as raising 10 to a the power times a constant. In the second case, taking a log to any base is the same as taking a log base 10 and dividing by the same constant.
In both these cases, the constant is the log (base10) of the base you're switching to. So if you want to work with powers of 2, or logs base 2, you'd first figure out log(base10) 2 = 0.301, and keep that number handy.
To find y = a ^ x
- find log base 10 of a, ( described here ), call it k.
- multiply k and x, call it kx.
- y is 10 ^ kx ( described here )
|
To find y = log (base a) of x
- find log base 10 of a, ( described here), call it k
- find log base 10 of x, call it lx.
- y is lx divided by k
|
At first glance, these methods don't look much different from the sets of methods described in the more basic tutorials, but that's not the case. They are a pain. Learning to take logs and powers of 10 with the L scale takes practice - the decimal point rules need to be paid careful attention the first few times through. But worse than that, there's no way to 'chain' these operations. They generate intermediate results that are off the C/D scales, ( on L ). They need to be remembered or written down, then transferred to the C scale for multiplying/dividing. This reduces both precision and speed.
On the plus side, these methods are completely general. You can directly calculate 2 ^ 1,000,000 = 1.0 E 301030 just by applying the above methods. You can't read results like that off the LL scales.
Examples
- 9^5 to 3 decimal places
- k = log10 of 9 = 0.9543, (direct lookup on L at 9C)
- kx = 0.9543 x 5 = 4.771 (from C,D, setting decimal)
- use L,C method for 10^kx
- xi = 4, xm = 0.771
- coefficient of answer is on C at 0.771L : 5.902
- answer is 5.902E4, approx 59000
- (exact answer is 59049)
- 0.09^-0.2
- to find log10 of 0.09, we use the L,CI method:
- 0.09 = 9E-2
- mantissa is on L at 9CI: 0.0458
- k = log10 of 0.09 = -0.0458 + (-2) + 1 = -1.0458
- kx = -1.0458 x -0.2 = 0.20916
- 10 ^ kx is a direct lookup on C at 0.20916L = 1.619
(In this next example, we'll take our time and use a 1200 pixel rule, 1000x zoom, magnifier, and subpixel aligning, and retain decimal places until the final result)
- 3.27^5.50
- k = log10 of 3.27 is 0.514548 (direct lookup on L)
- kx = 0.514548 * 5.5 = 2.83001 (from C,D and setting decimal)
- use the L,C method for 10^kx:
- xi = 2, xm = 0.83001
- coefficient of answer is on C at 0.83001L : 6.76099
- answer is 6.76099E2 = 676.099 approx 676.
The answer with a calculator is 676.102652, so the slide rule gave an answer which is correct to to 5 decimal places, 676.10, even with the multiple steps.
The answer with no zooming is still 676, with some question about the final 6, and quite a bit faster.
The answer using a zoomed LL3_E scale is 676.10, much faster, but requiring an LL stack on your slide rule.
- log(base 12) 16
- to find k = log(base10) of 1.2E1, use the L,C method:
- mantissa is at 1.2C on L: 0.0792
- k = 0.0792 + 1 = 1.0792.
- to find lx, use the L,C method again:
- mantissa is at 1.6C on L: 0.2041
- lx = 0.2041 + 1 = 1.2041.
- final answer: lx / k = 1.2041/1.0792 = 1.116 (using division on C and D )
- division refresher course images:
- log( base 0.3 ) 0.4
- to find k = log(base10) of 3E-1, use the L,CI method
- mantissa is at 3CI on L: 0.5229
- k = -0.5229 + (-1) + 1 = -0.5229
- find lx = log(base10) 0.4 the same way: -0.3979
- divide lx/k with C and D: answer 0.761
|
|